Mar 5, 2012

The Strange Case of the Names of Shazam and Captain Marvel

Geoff Johns and Gary Frank are coming out next week with the new "Curse of Shazam" backup feature in JUSTICE LEAGUE #7. Captain Marvel will no longer be known as Captain Marvel. Instead, he'll be known as... Shazam.

Yep, that's pretty much the look on my face too.


I know, I know, it's a stupid, stupid move because "Shazam" is the magic word and the catchphrase of the character, so basically when you say "Shazam!", it's not as cool because now it just sounds like you're calling The Big Red Cheese over. But DC has a logical explanation for at least making this big move, which is that that's what people who don't read comics know him as anyway.

Now, creatively, I don't think this decision holds water (we may as well change the name of The Who song from "Baba O'Riley" to "Teenage Wasteland"), but it's difficult to argue in terms of marketing (I would bet that the song would increase downloads if the name were changed from "Baba O'Riley" to "Teenage Wasteland").

But how did we get here? I'm glad you asked. Would you believe me if I told you that this is all the fault of a character you've never heard of, from a publisher you've never heard of?



When Captain Marvel was first created by Bill Parker and C.C. Beck, he was slated to appear in a Fawcett Comics anthology called FLASH COMICS, to debut in February 1940. Because Jay Garrick, the original Flash, showed up in All-American Publications' (one of the companies that would merge to become the modern-day DC Comics) FLASH COMICS, Fawcett changed its title to WHIZ COMICS. Also, Beck never specified Captain Marvel's color scheme and left it up to the color separator, so there is an alternate universe where the Power of Shazam made its debut in this issue and looks like this:

Check out Marvel Family Web for more on this.

Now, here's another wrinkle in that Maybe Machine: the original name for The World's Mightiest Mortal? Captain Thunder. Not Captain Marvel. Captain Thunder. But as with "FLASH COMICS," Fawcett again got beaten to the punch, this time by a publisher called Fiction House, who had a character named Captain Terry Thunder of the British Army.

According to ComicVine, this guy appeared in all of 19 issues. 19!

And that's why The Big Red Cheese is named Captain Marvel today, and it was as Captain Marvel that he became the bestselling hero of The Golden Age. And since you are all faithful readers of The Comics Cube (you are, right?), you'll also know that Fawcett and Captain Marvel folded in the 50s from reading this article. Which you already did, right?

All right, so Fawcett stopped publishing Captain Marvel in 1953. Thirteen years later, in 1966, publisher Myron Fass of M.F. Enterprises (Guess what M.F. stands for.) got legendary creator Carl Burgos to tell a story about an android who can detach his limbs from his body with the magic word, "Split!" That hero's name would be... Captain Marvel.

He also has a young friend named Billy Baxton.
It's not a ripoff because it's not spelled "Batson."
No, really.


That's when Stan Lee realized that the "Captain Marvel" trademark was up for grabs, and that it should belong to, you know, Marvel, for obvious reasons. So in 1968, Lee and artist Gene Colan put out the first issue of CAPTAIN MARVEL.


Captain Mar-Vell was a warrior from the war-loving alien race known as the Kree. Over time he'd evolve into one of Marvel's most pivotal and symbolic heroes, if not ever developing into one of the biggest in terms of mainstream recognition. Here's his most popular costume.



This was enough for Marvel to secure the trademark to the name "Captain Marvel," which meant that DC could not use the name in promotional material. However, since Fawcett still owned the copyright to Captain Marvel, they could use the name in the stories themselves. This is why Cap's books have been called some iteration of "SHAZAM" ever since DC licensed the character in 1973.

1973


1987

1994
Note that for the 1973, they were able to put "The Original Captain Marvel" under the title, but with no trademark sign beside the name. This goes against the conventional wisdom that they cannot use the name on the covers. I asked Brian Cronin why this was, and basically, DC got away with it for a year before the tagline changed. It should be noted that after the 1973 series, that first issue of THE POWER OF SHAZAM in 1994 is the only time I've seen it done since, so I'm assuming they walk a legal tightrope whenever they do it. I'm not sure. If anyone wants to clear up these details, please feel free to do so in the comments section.

Marvel, meanwhile, must continue to publish a CAPTAIN MARVEL comic every few years, or its trademark will elapse. There's no rule as to the intervals, but here's a list courtesy of Brian Cronin's Comic Book Legends Revealed:

They published the adventures of the Kree warrior, Captain Marvel, from 1968 until 1979 (the last few years as a bi-monthly).

Then the Death of Captain Marvel in 1982.

Then the mini-series the LIFE of Captain Marvel (reprinting his most significant achievements) in 1985.

In 1982, Marvel introduced a new Captain Marvel (as mentioned last week), and in 1989, when no Captain Marvel book had been released for awhile, suddenly, she had a one-shot!


In 1994, once again, she had a one-shot!

In 1995, the first Captain Marvel’s son had an ongoing series for less than a year.

In 1997, Marvel published an Untold Tale of Captain Marvel.

In 2000, Peter David gave Marvel’s son another boost, with a series that lasted until 2004.


Thus, since 1973, DC has been trying to figure out a way to not use the name "Captain Marvel" for Billy Batson's alter-ego. In a 1974 issue of SUPERMAN (no. 276), they experimented with a Captain Marvel analogue hero named... Captain Thunder!



Willie Fawcett was a boy given powers by a shaman, and all he had to do was say "Thunder" to turn into Captain Thunder.

Learn more about this issue here.

Captain Thunder was also the name used by Roy Thomas and Dan Newton for their reworking of the Shazam concept in the early 80s. This was a proposed treatment that never went through, which had the exact same basic concept, except with the big change of making Billy and Cap black.

Again, thanks to Brian Cronin.


(Roy Thomas wouldn't be denied, however — a few years later, he'd create Captain Thunder and Blue Bolt with Dann Thomas and Dell Barras. I have this issue. It's pretty good.)



Most recently, in DC's FLASHPOINT, the alternate universe featured a darker version, also named Captain Thunder.


So there's been precedent for changing Cap's name to one that doesn't involve the word "Marvel" for almost forty years at this point. Now they're pretty much giving up and they're just gonna call him "Shazam." Again, marketingwise, it's probably the best decision, but creatively, it's... kinda stupid. Anyway —

This leads us to a few What If scenarios, so let me address them here:

What if Marvel had been the ones to license Captain Marvel? Marvel didn't have to create a new character to retain the copyright. They could have licensed The World's Mightiest Mortal and gone with him instead, most likely integrating him into the Marvel Universe. He'd have been in the hands of Stan Lee and the Marvel Bullpen (Jack Kirby and Steve Ditko were going or had gone by then), so could it have worked?

I don't think so. See, people say Captain Marvel isn't as adaptable as some of his Golden Age contemporaries such as Superman, but the reasoning for that is twofold, from where I sit. First, Captain Marvel was one of the most acclaimed — that's not the same as popular — characters of the Golden Age, so it is, by nature, held to a higher standard. It's the same reason that Green Arrow — a character who was never really praised highly in the Golden Age — is easier to develop and adapt to modern times than someone like Plastic Man — a character whose stories were and still are held in high acclaim.

The other reason for Cap's being difficult to adapt is simply this: he disappeared. Unlike Superman and Batman, who were able to slowly adapt to changing times, Captain Marvel was not. So if you bring him back, you're stuck in a catch-22: either you adapt him and get criticized for changing him too radically, or you bring him back from where the Golden Age left off and then he's outdated. Unless you're Jeff Smith, you lose. Seriously, in the two hundred ninety eight billion thousand Captain Marvel revivals in the last forty years, that's the one that's lived up to the character's potential. That's one.

One thing though that would have changed completely, which would be big for kids who grew up in the 80s. If DC didn't get Captain Marvel, we wouldn't have gotten He-Man. You see, in the 70s, Lou Scheimer produced two shows: Shazam and Mighty Isis.


You know what Lou Scheimer got a hold of a decade later? That's right, He-Man.


He-Man and the Masters of the Universe just started out as a Conan the Barbarian property, changed for the toyline. It wasn't until Scheimer got onto the property that he got that whole "Young prince changes to a mighty hero with magic words and a bolt of lightning" thing going.

So there. If DC didn't get Captain Marvel, you would have had a different childhood. If you were a child of the 80s. Which I was.

What if DC had gone with Roy Thomas's Captain Thunder? Making Captain Marvel an African-American may have given Captain Marvel a nice shot in the arm back in the day, especially as that was the era of "relevance." But ultimately, I don't think it would have mattered. I'm going to have Dream of the Endless say it for me:


Even if Roy Thomas and Don Newton came out with an excellent story, it would have stood the test of time as an excellent story, but Caucasian Billy Batson/Captain Marvel would have been brought back to the forefront. It's the same reason why Hal Jordan is Green Lantern again and why Barry Allen is the Flash again. (Remember, Alan Scott and Jay Garrick were never in cartoons or serials, while Hal and Barry were both on Superfriends, so they are the iconic versions of those characters and what they will keep reverting to).

In addition, in 1981, there was a Shazam cartoon, so kids would have been looking for that particular iteration of Captain Marvel anyway. Unless DC went all out with Thomas and Newton's Captain Thunder, with cartoons and T-shirts and ads, and actually changed public consciousness regarding the character, it wouldn't have lasted.



And finally, what if he had been called Captain Thunder in the first place? Would DC have been able to market him more strongly since 1973? Well, it's possible, but as far as I'm concerned, I don't think there would have been much of a difference. Again, Captain Marvel had a cartoon in the 80s — I knew he was Captain Marvel with the magic word "Shazam" when I was four, and I don't think it's a hard concept to get. In other words, I think the problem with the name is small, and a good story is a good story, and calling the book SHAZAM makes as much sense as calling Superman's and Batman's books ACTION COMICS and DETECTIVE COMICS. I don't think the negative effect of not being able to call him Captain Marvel is so big that it can't be done away with with the proper amount of marketing.

So no, I don't think calling him "Shazam" is going to make the character that much more marketable (not that we'd be able to know from the sales numbers because "Curse of Shazam" is only a backup feature). In other words, DC just split the existing fanbase over a small bit of trivia and you just read this entire article, all because this guy exists.



You have to admit, when you think of it that way, it's kinda funny.

As a bonus, here's an image for you. Don't ask me where it's from. I just got it off of here. Here's Waverider showing us DC's Cap as the other Captains I mentioned.



And before we end, let me leave you with this house ad from Lightning Comics.

Captain Shazam? Really, guys?
Read more here.
SHAZAM!

1 comment:

Kid said...

Interesting article. Maybe they should 'promote' him up the ranks. Major Marvel anyone?

Post a Comment

All comments on The Comics Cube need approval (mostly because of spam) and no anonymous comments are allowed. Please leave your name if you wish to leave a comment. Thanks!

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...